Đang tải dữ liệu…
Đang tải dữ liệu…
The Internet Computer runs a "reverse gas" model: users pay nothing, developers pre-pay by converting ICP into cycles — and the ICP is destroyed at that conversion, recorded as a Burn transaction on the ledger. This ledger reads the cumulative Burn series from DFINITY's official ledger-api, 1,940 days since 11 May 2021, and sums 2,891,713 ICP burned — 0.52% of the 556.2M total supply, 3.2% of the 89.9M ICP minted for voting rewards and node providers. Burning barely existed for the first three years, multiplied 80× from September 2024, peaked at 1.67M in 2025, then slowed in 2026 just as DFINITY bet Mission 70 on a 15× increase.
A snapshot at one moment — it has no 24-hour or 30-day meaning.
Tokens gone from the supply forever — sitting in a dead wallet or destroyed via burn() reducing total supply directly. Irreversible.
Total burned over max supply (all components: permanent burn, plus the buyback fund where the token has one). For tokens with overhang, read it against that cell: is burning winning or losing against the supply still ahead?
00:00 to 24:00 UTC. The last day runs from 00:00 to measurement time, so it is partial.
| Day | Total burn | Minted?Newly minted TRX every block (~136 TRX/block, ~3.69M/day): 8 TRX to the block-producing Super Representative, 128 TRX split among the top 127 SRs by votes — each SR keeps a commission (default 20%) and passes the rest to the STAKERS who voted for them. This is where the 4–5% TRX staking yield comes from: it is paid by the printer, diluting all holders ~1.4%/year — holding TRX unstaked quietly pays the stakers’ yield. | Net?Burn minus mint. Positive (green) = supply shrinking; negative (red) = net inflation. Fee burning offsets only part of issuance — this column’s sign, not the token’s reputation, answers whether it is really deflationary. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/10 | 74,18 | 11.538 | −11.464 |
| 07/10 | 1.047,60 | 28.457 | −27.409 |
| 06/10 | 274,31 | 39.363 | −39.089 |
| 05/10 | 980,46 | 174.173 | −173.192 |
| 04/10 | 835,46 | 7.568 | −6.732 |
| 03/10 | 245,91 | 18.380 | −18.134 |
| 02/10 | 1.148,71 | 52.368 | −51.219 |
| 01/10 | 510,03 | 6.768 | −6.258 |
| 30/09 | 828,58 | 25.967 | −25.139 |
| 29/09 | 854,46 | 3.903 | −3.049 |
| 28/09 | 569,29 | 3.073 | −2.503 |
| 27/09 | 608,44 | 13.903 | −13.294 |
| 26/09 | 950,45 | 2.991 | −2.041 |
| 25/09 | 9.168,64 | 2.922 | +6.246 |
| Total1977 days · entire series | 2.945.669,83 | 91.012.110 | −88.066.440 |
Burn = Burn transactions on the ICP ledger per UTC day (ICP → cycles via the Cycles Minting Canister, plus 0.0001 ICP transfer fees); Mint = Δ total supply + burn — lumpy because ICP is only minted when neuron maturity is disbursed or monthly node pay is issued. The 2026 sawtooth peaks are mostly recurring cycles top-ups by a few large accounts.
At this pace supply GROWS 0,75% per year — net inflation.
On ICP, canisters (smart contracts) pay for compute and storage in cycles, pegged to the IMF's XDR: 1 trillion cycles = 1 XDR (~$1.30) regardless of ICP's price. To get cycles, a developer sends ICP to the NNS Cycles Minting Canister, which destroys the ICP and mints cycles at the prevailing ICP/XDR rate. That destruction is the Burn record on the ledger — what this ledger counts. ICP transfer fees (0.0001 ICP per transaction) are also destroyed but are negligible.
As of 3 Sep 2026: 2,891,713 ICP burned; total supply 556,203,582 (469,213,710 at genesis + 89,881,585 minted − burned). Supply is up 18.5% since genesis; burning has offset 3.2% of minting.
Burn by year: 2021 (from 11 May) 10,988; 2022 87,012; 2023 57,846; 2024 561,127; 2025 1,670,173 — the peak year at 4,576/day; 2026 to 31 Aug 498,292 (2,042/day). The first three years total 155,846 ICP — 5.4% of the total — meaning 94.6% of lifetime burning happened in the last 24 months.
In the first eight months of 2024 ICP burned 1,194–4,583 per month, a median of 67 ICP/day — a compute network barely consuming ICP. On 9 Sep 2024 it jumped to 4,637, 10 Sep 10,912, 13 Sep 21,629 (the record at the time), and September closed at 141,083 — 50× August. It never went back: October 104,243, November 133,093, December 165,384; the last four months of 2024 make up 97% of the year.
DFINITY summarized 2024's cycle-burn rate as up "over 8,800%"; this ledger can only record the result on the ledger and cannot identify which application drove the step — the Burn series carries no sender name. What is measurable: the lowest burn day of 2025 was 422 ICP, higher than the highest day of the first seven months of 2024 — the new floor sits above the old ceiling.
2025 opened with the four strongest months ever: January 271,704; February 288,852 (the record month, 10,316/day); March 239,533; April 197,380 — 997K ICP in 120 days, 34% of the lifetime total. Then it faded: June 112,244, July 85,395, and from September to December 2025 only 39–46K per month. In between came 29 Aug 2025: 89,471 ICP in one day, 70× the day before, 3.1% of five years of burning — the all-time record, nearly triple the second-highest day (6 Feb 2026: 30,852).
The 2026 daily series is sawtoothed: week of 5 Jan 18,874, week of 12 Jan 8,948, week of 19 Jan 23,996; week of 2 Feb 34,614 then week of 9 Feb 3,443; week of 16 Mar 35,667 then week of 23 Mar 5,377; week of 4 May 49,617 (the year's highest) then week of 18 May 6,090. Every day above 30K ICP is in 2026 (6 Feb, 9 May, 19 Mar, 11 Apr) or is the 2025 record, and each sits between days of 400–700 ICP.
An analysis on the DFINITY forum (Aug 2026) dissected the large burning addresses and found the cause: most of a busy day's burn is a few accounts' recurring cycles top-ups — one account burned exactly 4,107.55 ICP ten times at 30-day intervals, then after receiving 17,721 ICP on 10 Jun 2026 switched to weekly round-number top-ups (4,500 on 15 Jun, 3,625 on 24 Jun, 3,800 on 31 Jul, 3,750 on 7 Aug); another shared payment service had burned 61,500 ICP, funded by 37 sources including 21,100 ICP from the OpenChat SNS treasury. The post's conclusion: "the cadence did not accelerate because consumption grew — the money arrived in a lump and is being spent down."
2026 monthly totals: 82,763 / 67,557 / 81,084 / 61,882 / 100,027 / 30,300 / 24,818 / 49,103 (January → August). The first half averaged 2,640/day; June–August only 1,130/day; July 2026 (24,818) is the lowest month since August 2024. Trailing-12-month burn is 665,879 ICP — 60% below the 12 months before.
ICP is minted for two things: NNS neuron voting rewards and monthly node-provider pay. This ledger derives mint = Δ total supply + burn from the same ledger-api: 2021 (235 days) 6.62M; 2022 17.47M; 2023 19.35M; 2024 15.97M; 2025 19.82M; 2026 to 31 Aug 10.62M (43.5K/day, ≈ 15.9M a year, 2.9% of supply). 89.88M in total since genesis, 31× the amount burned.
But the ledger only sees rewards when they are withdrawn: voting rewards accrue inside neurons as off-ledger "maturity" and become ICP only when the neuron owner disburses them. That makes daily minting lumpy — 20 Dec 2025 minted 2.05M, 10 Dec 2025 1.32M, 3 Aug 2022 1.74M, 5 Aug 2023 1.47M — and ledger minting (3.7% in 2025) far below the 9.72% inflation DFINITY itself published in January 2026, which counts maturity granted but not yet withdrawn. The gap is future issuance this table has not recorded yet.
Ledger mint-to-burn ratios: trailing 12 months 19.41M minted versus 665,879 burned — 29:1; 90 days 31:1; 30 days 21:1 thanks to a decent August. Breaking even against ledger minting alone would need ~43K ICP burned a day — half the 29 Aug 2025 record, every day.
Dominic Williams' Mission 70 whitepaper (13 Jan 2026) targets cutting ICP inflation from 9.72% to ~2.92% by end-2026 on two fronts: cutting voting and node rewards so issuance falls to 5.42% a year by January 2027 (−44%), and raising the cycle-burn rate 15-fold — from 0.05 to 0.77 XDR per second — through the Caffeine AI platform and "Cloud Engines" burning 20% of revenue. The NNS approved the reward-change package on 7 Apr 2026.
The ledger shows the burn half moving the wrong way: 0.77 XDR per second is ~66,500 XDR a day, about 35K ICP burned daily at early-September-2026 prices; August 2026 actually ran 1,584/day and July 801 — a 22–44× gap. The cycle-burn rate measured on 19 Mar 2026 was 0.069 trillion cycles per second, 9% of target. The supply half will be measurable in the Mint column from late this year: 2026 minting (43.5K/day) is already 20% below 2025 (54.3K/day), but mostly from maturity-withdrawal timing, not yet from the new reward schedule.
This ledger does not forecast whether Mission 70 succeeds; it records the two numbers that must change for the target to be real: the Burn column must multiply by tens and the Mint column must nearly halve, both within 16 months of the announcement.
CoinGecko lists 556.2M circulating — equal to total supply, no max; ICP has no remaining vesting under this count, and this ledger has no unlock-schedule source for ICP (the Unlocks column is empty). Supply pressure comes from maturity awaiting withdrawal and monthly node rewards, not from an unlock schedule.
ATH $700.65 on 10 May 2021 — listing day, one day before the burn series begins; ATL $2.00 on 1 Aug 2026, one month before this reading. Peak to trough the price fell 99.7%; total supply rose 18.5%; the lifetime burn equals 15 days of ledger minting.
The sole source is DFINITY's ledger-api.internetcomputer.org: the cumulative icp-burned series (in e8s) and supply/total per day since 11 May 2021. Daily burn = difference between consecutive points; mint = Δ supply + burn. State reads the latest points of the same API. Verification: the week of 4 May 2026 reads 49,617 ICP versus 49,900 in press coverage (0.6% off); total supply matches CoinGecko to 0.00005%.
The ledger deliberately does not back-derive from the cycle-burn-rate metric via the XDR rate: that method yields 3.24M ICP where the ledger records 2.89M — a 12% gap, because cycles minted (ICP already burned) are not necessarily spent, and cycles spent may come from ICP burned months earlier. Nor does it count undisbursed maturity as mint. USD in the state card = quantity × price at the time the page was last updated.
How much ICP has been burned in total?
2,891,713 ICP as of 3 Sep 2026 per Burn transactions on the official ledger, 0.52% of the 556.2M total supply and 3.2% of the 89.9M ICP minted. 94.6% of it happened since September 2024.
How does ICP get burned?
When a developer sends ICP to the Cycles Minting Canister for cycles (1 trillion cycles = 1 XDR), the ICP is destroyed and recorded as a Burn transaction; canisters spend cycles on compute and storage. End users pay nothing — the "reverse gas" model. The 0.0001 ICP transfer fee is also destroyed but negligible.
What was the largest ICP burn day?
29 Aug 2025 with 89,471 ICP — 3.1% of five years of burning in one day, 70× the day before. Second is 6 Feb 2026 (30,852). The record month is February 2025 at 288,852 ICP; the record week is the week of 4 May 2026 at 49,617.
Why did ICP burning surge from September 2024?
From 9 Sep 2024 the daily burn jumped from a median of 67 to thousands of ICP and stayed there; September 2024 burned 141,083, 50× August. DFINITY attributed 2024's 8,800%+ rise in cycle burn to app growth; this ledger cannot name the specific application because Burn records carry no sender.
Why is the 2026 burn series sawtoothed?
Because most of a busy day's burn is recurring cycles top-ups by a few large accounts — one burned exactly 4,107.55 ICP ten times at 30-day intervals, then weekly from June 2026 — per an August 2026 DFINITY forum analysis. Ordinary days run 400–700 ICP.
Is ICP deflationary?
No. Over the trailing 12 months the ledger minted 19.41M ICP and burned 665,879 — 29:1 — and the mint figure excludes undisbursed maturity (DFINITY put inflation at 9.72% in January 2026). Breaking even against ledger minting alone would need ~43K ICP burned a day.
What is Mission 70?
DFINITY's plan (whitepaper of 13 Jan 2026) to cut ICP inflation by at least 70% by end-2026 — from 9.72% to ~2.92% — by lowering voting and node rewards (issuance to 5.42% by January 2027) and raising the cycle-burn rate 15× via Caffeine AI. The NNS approved the reward changes on 7 Apr 2026; as of August 2026 actual burning is 22–44× short of target.
Where does this ICP burn data come from?
From DFINITY's ledger-api.internetcomputer.org — actual Burn transactions on the ledger, not derived from the cycle-burn-rate metric (which yields 3.24M, 12% above the ledger's 2.89M). Checked: the week of 4 May 2026 is within 0.6% of press figures, and total supply matches CoinGecko to 0.00005%.